I may be an Anglophile, but I've always been immune to the
charms of certain bedrock British institutions like Sherlock Holmes, Robin Hood,
and the whole fantasy universe of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round
Table. The first two were done no favors by the musicals Baker Street
and Lionel Bart's Twang! But Camelot has an emotional hold on many
that few musicals ever achieve. Just not on me. But I am older now, and willing
to exam the matter with some openness and patience. So, take me away, you
Medieval sylvan fantasia . . . Show me the magic.
Lerner & Loewe skirted the follow-up hurdle after My Fair Lady by going Hlwd with Gigi. But eventually they faced The Big
Street again, settling on Arthurian lore as a fitting volume to their catalog. They
certainly didn't lessen the pressure of great expectations by hiring much of
the same personnel from MFL,
including director Moss Hart, designer Oliver Smith, and actors Julie Andrews
and Robert Coote (Col. Pickering). The show's lead was another esteemed British
stage & screen star, also a non-singer--but mellifluent of voice: Richard
Burton. The package felt predestined, expensive, Important--and an easy sell. But
the road to Bway was a battlefield: first Loewe, then Hart were stricken and hospitalized,
leaving Lerner (the trio were the producers as well) in charge of the show.
Considering the biggest problems were all in Lerner's libretto, this wasn't the
pathway to clarity. After nine weeks on the road, the show opened on Bway, December
3, 1960. Despite fair to poor reviews the advance kept seats filled, tho lines
at the box office soon disappeared. Moss Hart returned post-opening to clean up
Lerner's mistakes; and the musical got a second wind after Burton & Andrews
performed a lenghty sequence on the Ed Sullivan Show--which ostensibly was to
honor My Fair Lady's fifth
anniversary. But even with this bump in business, the show was never quite the
smash hit it pretended to be. The Tony committee thought so little of it they
couldn't even let it fill the fourth slot for Best Musical, naming just three
in 1961 (snubbing The Unsinkable Molly
Brown and Tenderloin as well) Yet
the OCR album sold more than any other but MFL;
the best-selling record in the country for 6 weeks --remaining on the charts
for 265 weeks; just over five years. Incredibly, Lerner & Loewe built their
own Bway label and imprimatur (second only to Rodgers & Hammerstein) on the
strength of just five titles--and one
of those a film musical. Tho it must be said that without My Fair Lady to anchor their fame, their other musicals would not
have retained such luster.
Loewe wasn't enthused about Lerner's choice of T.H.
White's Once and Future King for
their next project, but once invested he gave it his usual melodic sheen--at
least where it counts. And for Loewe nothing counted more than The Big Ballad: the apex of all his musicals:
"Almost Like Being in Love," in Brigadoon,
"I Talk to the Trees" in Paint
Your Wagon, the Oscar-winning title song from Gigi; and top of the heap: My
Fair Lady's "On the Street Where You Live"--a song so geared for
the Hit Parade, it was virtually tangential to the show, sung by a secondary,
nearly minor, character. A song so popular you could retire on its income alone.
Loewe (& Lerner) made sure that Camelot
had--if nothing else--another like it. And "If Ever Would I Leave
You," filled the bill and then some. It's a full meal of a ballad, walking
thru the seasons on a lush, majestic line of updated operetta; manly,
commanding, a prime baritone aria. It became, unavoidably, Goulet's signature
song. Next to it, the title song is best known--but not much else; this isn't
the platter of hits that MFL was.
"Camelot" is a regal tune that captures the feel of the show, but isn't
it odd that Arthur's catalog of Camelot's virtues are entirely meteorological? Lerner
couldn't think of anything better than the weather? English weather? The song only earns its gravitas in the show's
coda, the adopted Kennedy epitaph:
Don't let it be forgot
That once there was a spot
For one brief shining moment . .
Arthur's establishing song, "I Wonder What the King
is Doing Tonight," sets the bar for high expectations; a spoken-sung
reverie that compares well to Rex Harrison's "Why Can't the English?"
Equally fine are two numbers that are extended conversations: "What Do the
Simple Folk Do?" (which sparked a box office run after being seen on
Sullivan) and "Then You May Take Me to the Fair," which Hart cut after
the Bway opening for a leaner pace. Yet the song survives, being better than
most in the show, tho Lerner's cleverness is shamelessly cute: ("You'll
open wide him?/I'll subdivide him/From fore to aft?/He'll feel a draft"). "The
Lusty Month of May," seems a direct steal of "June is Busting Out All
Over," (if not Pajama Game's
"Once a Year Day"), but it's a much needed lift to a show lacking high
spirits. "C'est Moi" has at least a tinge of humor, where there's
scarcely any elsewhere. The score, however, has a high turkey count: "Fie
on Goodness," and "The Seven Deadly Sins" were retained on the OCR,
but are often dropped, as well as a song for Mordred and Morgan LeFay (a
character often dropped as well) called "The Persuasion"--that to
date has never been recorded. Unforgivably, Julie Andrews' songs, which were such
a highlight of MFL, are mostly flat
here. When was the last time you heard "The Simple Joys of Maidenhood,"
"I Loved You Once in Silence," or "Before I Gaze at You
Again," in any concert or recital? The latter, which was handed to Julie
the night before the first NY preview, could be mistaken for a lullaby--it
nearly puts me to sleep. Burton 's
spoken-aria, "How to Handle a Woman" is another dud, a languid reverie
concluding in middlebrow pandering: the trick being just "to love her,
simply love her." A sentiment the story soon proves worthless. L&L
made their greatest mistake in not setting Arthur's soliloquy to music--it's
the show's pivotal turn, the moment he sees his two shining stars burn for each
other; the first act curtain. It demands a Rose's Turn, an aria worthy of Billy
Bigelow. And what do we get instead? A speech
by Lerner, like most of his: obvious, pompous, full of stage brimstone and
faux-Shakespearean passion. Qualitites potentially transcended when set to
music by Loewe. What were they thinking? And finally, "Guenevere"--a
rousing British bolero, that unfortunately is used as a narrative wrap-up for
what feels like another hour of story. Is there another musical that--rather
than show it--has the chorus come on and tell
the climax of a tale? And that's the eleven o'clock number. All this and more
adds up to why I've never warmed up to the show.
Whatever Camelot's
narrative shorcomings on stage, its cinematic potential was obvious. Arthur
Freed, once MGM's premier musical producer now independent agent, couldn't
convince the studio's new boss (and musical hater) Joseph Vogel to buy the
property. Freed wanted Vincente Minnelli to direct--a natural thru-line from Gigi--using the Bway cast. But the show was
sold in February '61 to Jack Warner, who was snapping up Bway properties like a
kid in a candy store; and had yet to make The
Music Man, Gypsy, and My Fair Lady.
He took his time getting around to Camelot--altho
he aquired it before MFL. The success
of the latter would only add cachet to the former. George Cukor navigated MFL to safe harbor and a personal
Oscar--as well as one for Mr. Warner. Nothing suggests Cukor was ever offered Camelot--tho it might seem a good fit.
Instead, Warner handed it to Joshua Logan--who'd done well with Fanny, and South Pacific--at least commercially. Logan , like Lerner, wielded a power and
influence that left unchecked, reeked of hubris. Warner let him run wild. Jack
wanted the film shot entirely on the Warner lot (as was MFL and The Music Man).
but Josh insisted on real exteriors and took a long holiday touring castles in Spain . I've
seen better castles. (Some even on Hlwd stages) Then there's the matter of
casting . . .
Given that Julie Andrews and Richard Burton were now (post-Bway)
the #1 and #5 box office movie stars in America, it seems positively perverse
that anyone else would be considered for roles they had created--it wasn't as if they'd outgrown them. But Logan wasn't buying it. He wanted youth,
surprise, sex. Vanessa Redgrave had just broken thru in a trio of British films
in 1966: Blow Up, A Man for All Seasons, and
Morgan!--for which she received her
first Oscar nomination (alongside sister
Lynn for Georgy Girl). But she is
only 16 months younger than Andrews, and Richard Harris but five years behind Burton . So really it was
just a matter of taste. Logan couldn't see the
sex in Andrews, and thought Burton
wooden. And he didn't buy Robert Goulet's mannequin handsomeness. Franco Nero
was an Italian spaghetti western star, 25 years old and sexy in a looser,
proto-hippie manner. Logan 's
aim in finding chemistry between his Lancelot and Guenevere couldn't have been
better; Nero & Redgrave became longtime lovers, had a son together, and
reunited in marriage in 2006--that continues to this day. Logan 's casting may have lent a hipper,
younger vibe to what is essentially an operetta. And given that it is an operetta, wouldn't Andrews &
Goulet have been, in the long run, better suited and more appealing to the
musical's true devotees? Camelot
earned $12,250,000--a robust figure for the time, but the film cost $15mil; and
made far less than the $30mil take of My
Fair Lady, or Sound of Music's
$72mil haul--both of which Camelot
hoped to emulate in success and awards. It's hard to estimate the difference
Andrews might have made. But if Logan
was passing her up, Ross Hunter at Universal wasn't, slapping together a
somewhat bizarre original film musical for March '67 Roadshow release: Thoroughly Modern Millie. Even in such
weaker material--harking back to her roots in The Boy Friend--Julie hauled in a lofty $16 million.
Despite his reputation, Lerner's scripts are consistently
problematic; they lack focus, and grasp at too many threads in every story. Adapting
a volume as large as White's 1958 best seller--four books in one--is typical of
Lerner's overreach. His one good libretto was structured for him by Bernard
Shaw. Camelot is chock full of barely-there
stories; popular mythical figures reduced to cameos; too many characters, too
little characterization. For a newbie to the world of Arthurian lore, Camelot was little help in
orientation--maybe even the root of my disinterest in the subject. Lerner's
screenplay begins with Arthur on the verge of battle and engaged in a
post-story "How did this happen?" monologue; the voice of Merlin
goading, "think back, Arthur..." as tho we need to have the flashback
structure explained to us. (Maybe flashbacks were invented during the Age of
Chivalry) Merlin even has to tell Art to remember the day he met Guenevere, and
state "That's the beginning." Thanks for telling us--why didn't we
just start there? (as they did on stage); to quote Oscar Hammerstein, "a
very good place to start." The story proper begins with a long
establishing scene in the R&H mode; a sort of snowy Bench Scene, in which
the leading characters reveal themselves to us in song, before joining together
on a third number: the seduction. It's easily the show's strongest section,
setting a standard rarely met as the musical progresses. Logan 's Spanish castle may be real, but the
film's snowy forest is so artificial it generates hackles. On stage it might be
truly spectacular, but up close the fiberglass icicles and styrofoam snow heaps
look so phony as to be distracting. What may be enchanting on stage, may come
off poorly on film. Lerner wisely omitted the next stage scene: Merlin being lead
to the beyond by Nimue--a water nymph given no context, explanation, or reason
for being; yet given a song, "Follow Me," which sounds suspiciously
like a slow-tempo version of a later Lerner song (albeit to music by Burton
Lane), "Come Back to Me," from On
a Clear Day. Bad enuf we haven't a clue who Nimue is, Merlin gets scarce
definition--riding on assumption of audience familiarity--and serves only as
former personal wizard and tutor to Wart (Arthur's childhood nickname), who now
cries in vain for Merlin's guidance. Here's an example of Lerner's sloppy
mythology: Merlin is said to be "growing backwards," meaning, like
Benjamin Button he is de-aging as he moves from the future into the past. But
now that he's being lead to "eternal sleep," shouldn't he be at very
least a young man, if not an infant? So, why does he look as old as the hills?
Anyway, Lerner cut this from the movie, giving us instead, a choral reprise of
"Camelot" and a montage leading up to the royal wedding--which takes
place among a sea of candles, but no people. Wouldn't this be an event in the
kingdom?--Maria von Trapp had a bigger affair.
The romance and marriage consummated, we jump four years
to the invention of Might for Right, democracy and modern chivalry--all thought
up by Arthur in his chamber, much the way composers casually stumble upon their
greatest hits in those Hlwd music bios. Lerner writes for Arthur as tho he were
still Wart; "Proposition: it is far better to be alive than dead. If that
is so, then why do we have wars in which people can get killed?" Hardly
Shavian dialogue--nor should it be, but must it sound like the mental process
of a fifth-grader? Intelligent discourse isn't furthered by the introduction
of another extraneous character, King Pellinore (a doddering old bumbler) meant
for comic relief--alas, an aspiration unmet. But the heart of the story and the
musical's true justification is, of course, the love that erupts between Lancelot
& Guenevere, and the triad of emotions with Arthur. To Logan 's credit, this is done well on screen--no
doubt in large measure from the real attraction between Franco & Vanessa,
with a potent assist from Fred Loewe. Here's where "If Ever I Would Leave
You" proves its standing--sans lyrics in montage, the song conveys longing
and passion entirely in its melody. Warner's studio orchestra under the musical
direction of Alfred Newman & Ken Darby, is more symphonic than the plush
Bway orchestration, and the underscoring is worthy of its Oscar win. The song
itself isn't sung until the second half, with another instrumental montage
following; this one a seasonal catalog of trysts in meadow, snow, river and
fireside.
And then deep into the story, with no prior mention we
suddenly meet Mordred: Arthur's bastard son (the bad seed) come to destroy his
life and kingdom. But do we even need him to stir up trouble? Lerner has already
shown Lance alienating the court and fighting knights who dare call him out for
a secret everyone knows--and for which he is actually guilty. (So much for his
virtue; now he's an utter hypocrite) Isn't this enuf to tear at the fabric of
The Round Table, and lead to its demise? Arthur turns a blind eye to the truth,
but is said to make certain he never leaves the two lovers alone. Yet we've
just watched a four-season honeymoon album of private afternoons. Any of which Mordred
could've exposed, but instead Lerner has him direct his own sting operation,
catching the lovers in flagrante--altho
(oh, the irony!) they are in midst of final breakup. Of course the movie can
show all the events relayed in the chorus of "Guenevere," but words
and images in mutual description are superfluous, and ultimately all the action
merely seems to pad out an already long movie. Lerner felt it necessary to
clearly spell out Arthur's dilemmas in some ad-copy dialogue from Mordred:
"Let her die, your life is over, let her live, your life's a fraud."
Forced to seek battle on his favorite knight, Arthur has a last evening of
reverie. Lance & Jenny sneak in for a final rapproachment. But it's all
gone to shit. Not only has Arthur lost everything but Lance has too; Jenny has
entered a nunnery. (Away nasty feelings!) It's such a downer; a bad aftertaste from
most of the second half. But the coda is what people remember: the boy who
brings hope, the one who's heard the legend. So that's what it's all about:
storytelling; the creation of myth. The boy, Tom of Warwick, is, of course,
meant to be Thomas Malory--author of the 1485 Le Morte d'Arthur--the best known, primary source of Arthurian folklore.
"Run, boy, run," shouts Arthur on the strains of "Camelot,"
so that half a millenium later we might be watching such hoary romance tales
set to Lerner & Loewe tunes.
The Valley Music Theater in Woodland Hills lasted but
three summers in the mid-sixties, the first of those concrete-domed suburban LA
stages to end its program of Bway plays and musicals--following a last season
of such faltering fare as Frank Gorshin in What
Makes Sammy Run? and Anne Jeffreys in Do
I Hear a Waltz? My treasured local
venue offered one last highlight: a Carolyn Jones/ Mary Wickes High Spirits that suited them both
beautifully. The following summer, in the throes of withdrawl, I somehow
recruited my parents to trek down to Melodyland in Anaheim (some 70 miles), to
see Camelot with Kathryn Grayson--unknown
to me then as the former MGM soprano, now irrelevant in films; she was a replacement
Guenevere on Bway, which kept her much employed for years thereafter on the
road. But there are few things as depressing as a Sunday matinee in a
near-empty Theater-in-the-Round--especially for a show famous for its elaborate
scenery. And if that weren't bad enuf, my father's disinterest was more rabid
than usual--tho I could hardly blame him, bored as I was myself. Worst of all
was being across the street from Disneyland ,
with no amount of pleading getting me in. Oh, the humanity! This experience
having sullied my feelings for L&L's opus, I had little interest in the
movie's premiere Roadshow engagement in Hlwd that autumn. Especially with
actors I didn't even know. No, here was one I wasn't remotely keen to see. I did
see it two years later, not of my own volition but on the bill at the Los Altos cinema where I
worked 3 nights a week in my very first job--show business! I didn't much like
it then and saw no reason to watch it again until now. I also just watched the
HBO taping with Harris --who looks to have aged more than the 15 years since he
made the movie--and whose performance reeks of shameless ham built up over time.
He isn't wrong for Logan 's
movie, I can see his appeal. Still, I suspect Burton 's inner intensity would be more
interesting to watch. Try as he might Harris cannot spin Lerner's bombastic speeches into oratorical gold.
Vanessa Redgrave may then have been among the
hottest new film stars, but here appears surprisingly unformed. She has odd
moments acting for the camera--overly indicating her thoughts. Her singing
voice is adequate at best, with no attempt to match Andrews. Her "Lusty Month
of May" is slowed to a purr, and the ballads delivered in whisper. But
Redgrave is that rare actress whose beauty and talent would blossom with age,
and few would cite Camelot among her
greatest hits. Tho his singing voice is dubbed, Franco Nero hits all the right emotional
notes as Lancelot, sincerity oozing from his pleading eyes like a basset hound.
Tho the role is cast with movie-star cred, T.H. White actually describes Lance
as the ugliest man in Camelot--which surely adds depth to the love affair.
After all, it's easy to fall for a movie star, as Redgrave herself did. Lionel
Jeffries and Laurence Naismith disappear behind forests of facial hair as
Pellinore and Merlin, and David Hemmings is a properly creepy Mordred--slinking
about like a child molester--deprived of his two stage numbers. It's an
acceptable cast, just not an exciting, or muscially talented one.
After the success and prestige Hlwd accorded My Fair Lady and Sound of Music, Warner's expectations were high for Academy acclaim--surely
he had great hopes for the cast, Logan, and a Pic nomination; but apparently Camelot bores as many as it thrills. The
Tony committee liked Burton
and Andrews, but not Goulet; bestowing awards for scenery, costumes and
conducting; while snubbing Lerner, Loewe & Hart. Hlwd followed similar
suit. The film biz was turning a sharp curve in '67, and Warner, much to his
displeasure, was getting buzz for another film: a new-age gangster comedy, that
he particularly hated, Bonnie & Clyde.
Racial issues were at the heart of In the
Heat of the Night and Guess Who's
Coming to Dinner?; and the biggest smash of all was The Graduate--an art-house comedy that bled mainstream. But this
was still the era of the Bway Roadshow musical--and would-be Bway musical
movies (some of which eventually became stage hits) and so, the fifth Best Pic
slot went again to a musical, tho not to Camelot.
What then? Not the spring-released How to
Succeed... No, not big enuf: Then it must be Thoroughly Modern Millie. Nope. It was Doctor Doolittle, in which Rex Harrison talks to animals and
Anthony Newley sings Leslie Bricusse songs. Warner was surely appalled. Harris
and Redgrave also didn't make the list, tho Harris did win a Golden Globe (in
the comedy or musical category, ironically over Burton
in Taming of the Shrew and Harrison 's Doolittle).
Hlwd did concede some technical noms to Camelot's
visual design. Logan
hated the Bway checkerboard and banner settings by Oliver Smith, awash in red
and gold; and veered as far away from that as possible. How he came to hire a
30 year old Australian actor (with no previous design credits) to oversee the
film's art direction and costumes is a mystery. And for this debut John
Truscott was awarded two Oscars--tho the competition (culled from most of the
movies listed above) wasn't especially tough. The musical's two showy ensemble scenes
paralleled those in My Fair Lady: "The
Jousts" is Camelot's "Ascot
Gavotte," down to the same crowd-at-the-rail blow-by-blow chorale narration.
On screen, the song is dropped and the actual sporting event can be shown--in
triplicate. But there's still a parade of Medieval couture, with millinery resembling
a field of mutant mushrooms. It's more glamorous still, at the Embassy
Ball--er, Knighting Ceremony, with Jenny in quilted gold chain-mail. The sets
are indeed lacking red and gold, but in earth tones of dust, armor, brick.
Exteriors, like the laughable winter wonderland that opens the story aren't
Truscott's best. He's better with Arthur's chamber; the palace assembly room,
or the secret garden where Lance & Jenny meet to lament that they cannot
meet. (Yeah, it makes little sense). The New Yorker called the film "The
biggest Lord & Taylor Christmas window of all time."
Other obsessions consumed me at the time. I had maneuvered
my mother into a library upgrade--the regional branch--which meant a longer
drive, but now I had access to better books, the Sunday New York Times Arts & Leisure section and--gasp!--Variety. So while the world was shifting
on its cultural axis by the likes of one Sgt. Pepper and a headline-making "Summer
of Love" media-freakshow in San
Francisco , I was chin-deep into the makings and doings
of. . . Bway '67! I spent hours copying by hand, the full-page poster ads of the
incoming Bway musicals, which collected on my bedroom wall as the season
progressed. What did my parents make of all this, I wonder? Or did they bother
to take any of it in?--wrapped up, as they were, in their own Russian pessimism
and paranoia. Surely they were somewhat comforted in that showtunes, not
psychedelic rock, regularly blasted behind my bedroom door. Two nights before Camelot's premiere the first musical of
the Bway season (and the first I ever anticipated) opened. But Henry, Sweet Henry, was an unfortunate
victim of the zeitgeist and the dismissive breath of Clive Barnes, who that
summer, tuned-in and turned-off to Bway's traditional sound, condemning nearly
all the season's tuners to the dust bin in advance and heralding the gauntlet
of Hair. In his riveting book, The Season, William Goldman captured
this very season--the first ever that I followed as it unfolded. Part of Henry's significance, to me, was the
shock of its failure. Goldman claimed that preview houses--before Barnes
pounced--reacted with the same furor they accorded Mame. The Sunday after opening, Ed Sullivan featured a number on
his show, introducing a pint-sized Merman named Alice Playten in a cleverly
staged (by a then unknown Michael Bennett) song called "Poor Little
Person"--Go watch it on Youtube--Go now! I still recall the thrill of
laying my hands on the album in the May Co. record department, even before my
nightly Bway radio program debuted it on the air. In truth, Bob Merrill's first
full score since Carnival! had a
rather tinny, slightly cheesy feel to it, but, some moments as well that
positively electrified me.* Ultimately, Henry's
legacy, impressionable and heartbreaking as it was, comes to rest primarily as
introduction to Alice Playten--a tiny dynamo who, thanks to Ben Bagley, Al Carmines
and others, made a fair number of unique recordings--and remains forever one of
my top ten voices. Henry, Sweet Henry
was the sort of show Gower Champion should've been shaping.
Instead he was molding the year's other heartbreaker, Kander & Ebb's The Happy Time which came to tryout in LA--my first pre-Bway musical experience. Whether the show was brilliant or I was just 15 years old and saw myself in 16 year old Michael Rupert sharing the stage with Robert Goulet (making a timely bid to move beyond "Lancelot") and David Wayne, I absolutely loved it--tho too much reliance on photographs, made it seem spare of scenic splendor--I'd seen enuf bare-bones sets via the limitations of theater-in-the-round. Whether it was a cultural reflection or purely accidental, the Bway musical took an exit ramp from The Golden Age in 1967; nothing seemed to work anymore; not a singing Man Who Came to Dinner (Sherry!); not a saucy foreign film musicalized for its original star--which some thought a sign of the coming apocalypse (Illya, Darling); not a cavalcade of African-American history by Styne, Comden & Green (Hallelujah, Baby!). A haggard Judy Garland returned to the Palace--for her final time, and in legendary decline; and Marlene Dietrich made her last Madame Tussaud-like stand on Bway in October. The fall season reflected the uncertainty with only two new musical openings: Henry andMerrick 's
How Now Dow Jones--both summarily
dismissed. By the time The Happy Time opened in January '68, hope
was high the tide would shift. But Barnes wasn't charmed by this one either,
and suddenly it seemed the Bway musical had lost it footing--or audience--or
both.
Instead he was molding the year's other heartbreaker, Kander & Ebb's The Happy Time which came to tryout in LA--my first pre-Bway musical experience. Whether the show was brilliant or I was just 15 years old and saw myself in 16 year old Michael Rupert sharing the stage with Robert Goulet (making a timely bid to move beyond "Lancelot") and David Wayne, I absolutely loved it--tho too much reliance on photographs, made it seem spare of scenic splendor--I'd seen enuf bare-bones sets via the limitations of theater-in-the-round. Whether it was a cultural reflection or purely accidental, the Bway musical took an exit ramp from The Golden Age in 1967; nothing seemed to work anymore; not a singing Man Who Came to Dinner (Sherry!); not a saucy foreign film musicalized for its original star--which some thought a sign of the coming apocalypse (Illya, Darling); not a cavalcade of African-American history by Styne, Comden & Green (Hallelujah, Baby!). A haggard Judy Garland returned to the Palace--for her final time, and in legendary decline; and Marlene Dietrich made her last Madame Tussaud-like stand on Bway in October. The fall season reflected the uncertainty with only two new musical openings: Henry and
Meanwhile in Hlwd, studios blinded by the phenomenon of Sound of Music, were green-lighting
musicals like they were going out of style; which in turn made it so. But in
Hlwd '67, the trend was bigger stars with bigger budgets, and bigger junkets
for Roadshow releases. The next eight Bway musicals coming down the pike would
follow this model--with very mixed results. Much
like Camelot itself. There are
moments that sizzle in dramatic tension, but virtually none of the musical
sequences are special. And at three full hours it drags on for far too long,
then races to an ending. As for the magic? Well, you know what the they say
about smoke & mirrors.
Next Up: Half a Sixpence
Next Up: Half a Sixpence
Report Card:
Camelot
Overall Film: C+
Bway Fidelity: B
Musical Numbers from
Bway: 12
Musical Numbers Cut
from Bway: 6
New Songs: None
Standout
Number: "C'est Moi"
Casting: Trendy, non-musical
Standout Cast: Franco Nero
Cast from Bway: None
Direction: Dull in drama,
cliched in action,
Best in scenes of sexual
tension
Choreography: Casual, Maypole whimsy
Ballet: None (An "Enchanted Forest
Ballet"
was cut prior to Bway)
Scenic Design: Opulent, if
rarely beautiful
Costumes: Intricate if rarely
stunning
Standout Sets:
Arthur's chamber
Palace Throne Hall, Secret Garden
Titles: Gothic serif
on purple forest scene
Oscar Noms: 5--Cinematography, Sound
3
wins: Art Direction, Costumes, Scoring.
*For those true fanatics interested, to quote Bob Merrill's aching ballad: "Here I Am." The melody seduces me every
time by its orchestration alone, especially its exquisite fanfare in the
overture--the ultimate Loretta Young entrance, and my would-be theme song; Playten's two numbers are
indispensible, and Neva Small's are enjoyable as well. But "Weary Near to
Dyin'" is a jaw-dropping Bway take on the "hippie sound," which
underneath its Bway orchestration could be mistaken for Galt MacDermot, and
builds to a truly orgiastic finish. A travesty, no doubt, to rock purists. But
I find it endlessly fascinating--one can only wonder how Michael Bennett set it
to dance.
No comments:
Post a Comment