At the start of the most commercially and artistically
successful decade the Bway musical would ever enjoy in Hlwd, Warner Bros.
bought one of the biggest hits of the '50s and promptly cut the songs. All of
them. And this, under the supervision of the show’s director, who was also the
co-author and co-producer as well. Joshua Logan had been riding the Bway gravy
train for over twenty years, and was now as much a Hlwd A-lister as Elia Kazan.
Fanny was his third Oscar-nominated
Best Picture (he lost the directing nom in favor of Fellini for La Dolce Vita), and tho there were high
profile projects ahead, this was the last unqualified success Logan would have
on either stage or screen.
Fanny began as the mission of an ex-St.
Louis lawyer to break onto Bway. A famous trilogy of films by French auteur,
Marcel Pagnol caught the fancy of David Merrick in the late ‘40s, and he
pursued the rights all the way to Pagnol’s doorstep in Monte Carlo . Merrick conceived the
show in the
R&H blueprint (much as Liliom transformed into Carousel); shifting the story to New
Orleans, securing Harold Arlen & E.Y. Harburg for the score, and
screenwriters, Albert Hackett & Francis Goodrich for the book. Somehow it
didn't jell, but then Josh Logan entered the picture; and thus instantly within
reach was the brass ring: R&H themsevles. No surprise they were keen on the
material, but Rodgers refused to share producing credit with a novice such as
Merrick; and Merrick 's ego, even at such an
unearned stage, would not accept an "In Association With" credit. He
was right, of course, for he parlayed the musical into a hit and himself into a
career. But was it right for the show? It was the 10th longest running musical
in Bway history when it closed in '56--but where is it today in the canon? Is
there any doubt it'd still be in circulation had R&H taken it under their
wing? Merrick took songwriter Harold Rome
under his wing instead (and became his primary employer); but what does it say
when a show's director, co-author & co-producer allows the entire score to
be scuttled in Hlwd?
Poor Harold Rome., you might think. I don't. Upon
consideration, he seems the luckiest of Bway's tunesmiths. Thru the auspices of
the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, Rome broke thru as composer & lyricist of
a non-professional revue (think Pajama
Game's Union meeting entertainment: "Steam Heat") fittingly
titled, Pins & Needles. (My Baba
a one-time "Aristorcrat"-by-marriage, was a longtime member of the
ILGWU; working well into her 70s on a sewing machine in New York 's garment district.) Pins & Needles became a downtown
sensation that wound up running 1,108 performances on Bway during a Depression
that barely supported runs one quarter as long. Pegged as a writer of social
liberalism Rome
went on to a successful string of Bway revues, including the post-war Army
show, Call Me Mister--which we have
already seen, and from which but two of his songs were retained for the
movie. In 1952, Joshua Logan recruited
Rome for his summer-camp musical, Wish
You Were Here--his first book show, but not much of a
stretch given Rome's
own experience writing for camps
in his youth; nor were the characters much deeper than those in revue sketches.
Fanny was a far more challenging
assignment. This was pure R&H territory: character, story, an operatic
depth. The result is no embarrassment, but neither is it distinguished. Most
critics and historians write respectfully of the score--but with little hint of
affection. Ethan Mordden rhapsodizes on Rome 's
growth as a composer, and technically he may be right. But try as I might I
have never been able to get much out of it myself, which inclines me to agree
with Warner's decision to strip the movie of its vocals. And in truth, I never
feel--even when nudged by the
underscoring--a pang of disappointment that the song is held back--like I did,
say, with "Hello, Hello There" in Bells
Are Ringing. Warners was counting on the audience to feel the same way; and
far as I know, there was never much outcry over their decision.
Take us away
with you, we cry
My restless
heart
My restless,
restless, restless, restless
Restless,
restless heart and I.
Do you think he's restless? Or Fanny's plea:
I have to, I have to, I have to tell you
I have to but I don't know where to start
I have to, I have to, I have to say
What I'm shouting in my heart
I love you, I love you, I'll always love
you
Love you, want you, need you
My life through!
I've said it, I've told you, and now
forget it
Unless you have to say it too
Maybe you do
That's the entire song. Another major basso-aria for
Cesar, plods along, "Welcome home says the chair. . .
bed/lamp/clock;" the sort of checklist any four year-old could digest.
With so little poetry in the lyrics, nothing is lost with their excision. That
said, the few musical leitmotifs recycled from Rome 's score do not sound pedestrian--but
neither do they sound "French"--no accordians here. There's a very
effective use of "I Have to Tell You" as underscoring to Fanny's
climb up to the basilica, Norte Dame-de-la-Garde--looming high above the
Marseille waterfront. "Restless Heart" arises any time a ship is in
view, and "Panisse and Son" follows Chevalier around like a toy
poodle. But "Fanny" plays thematically thru-out, and effectively so.
The screenplay by Julius Epstein (yes, the one who wrote Casablanca ),
improves on the Bway book by Logan and S.N. Behrman., particularly in the
latter scenes of the story, where key scenes (such as Cesario meeting his
father, Marius for the first time) are seen and not just spoken of. But Logan doesn't simply open
up the film, he takes it off the soundstage entirely; heralding the other major
trend of musicals in the '60s: location. Marseille is so sumptuously featured
here, it could serve as a brochure for the tourism board. (Of course, this is
before The French Connection and a
slew of other crime dramas, exposed the modern city's underbelly.) But here
it's visually rapturous. Cesar's cafe, the Bar De la Marine, looks directly across
the inner harbor up to Notre Dame-de-la-Garde, a spectacular vista we're given
to soak in at various times of day & night. After the photographic debacle
of South Pacific, it was a relief
that Logan
chose not Leon Shamroy again, but master British cameraman (and sometime
director) Jack Cardiff. A longtime collaborator of The Archers (Michael Powell
& Emeric Pressberger), Cardiff won an Oscar for his saturated Technicolor
masterpiece, Black Narcissus, but was
no less memorable for The Red Shoes
or The African Queen.--He had just
earned an Oscar nom as director, and for Best Picture, the previous year for Sons & Lovers. His work on Fanny deservedly earned him another nod
as cinematographer, but tho he lost to another musical that year, his work here
is among the film's greatest assets. Look at the entrance of Fanny, as she
strolls into the Bar de la Marine in her summer dress; or the ancient street
steps in the light of a midnight lamp, as the lovers retreat to Fanny's home--a
most painterly composition.
There's a breathtaking moment when Caron enters the street
from her doctor's office, and we know instantly that she's pregnant; but even
more astonishing is how that single shot seems to presage the look of the
coming decade. The '60s mode begins with this face. Caron looks so fresh, so
sharply different from all the familiar--albeit fabulous--styles of the
sophisticated '50s, including her own. There's a looser, modder feel to her
hair; a thicker, more natural brow; lips of shocking apricot. She's the "It"
Girl of the moment (with Warren Beatty for an off-screen Boy Toy) --no
longer a girl
or gamine, but a
Woman--and a Parisienne, no less, who conquered the hearts of an American public.
(Americans loved the French in those years--a far cry from the ignorant and
unwarranted snobbery they maintain these days.) The former ballerina, who
didn't even dance in her last musical, now does a musical without songs. Leslie
Caron never lost her unique Gallic charm, even as she shed her youthful skins
and slipped into a long acting career. She earns her top-billing here, giving a
warm, sexy, luminous, and natural performance.
But tho she's the linchpin, the catalyst, the vessel of the tale, Fanny is almost
peripheral to what is, at heart, a story about fathers and sons. Cesar &
Marius take central focus in their child-parent embrace; Panisse is more
passionate about being a father (even if not his own) than a husband; and
Marius lastly agonizes over his own son lost to Panisse. Watching the film for
the fifth time, I couldn't stop wondering what it would have been like if Boyer
& Chevalier had switched roles. Perhaps I'm warming up to Chevalier, as he
seems almost welcome here, and yet there is still something unpleasant about
the 72 year old courting the 29 year old Caron. The story lays it on a bit
thick; does Fanny really have no
other options? The fact that local culture thinks nothing of such an old goat
taking a young wife--even supports and extolls him for it--feels a bit icky.
Somehow the thought of Boyer as Panisse (a one-time celluloid hearthrob--and a
sprightly 61 here) seems a bit less unsavory. There's a lot of Grumpy Old Men
repartee in their scenes together--much of it straight from Pagnol's original
plays. Some of it is timeless schtick, some of it hopelessly dated. It's hard
to get a bead on time here. Virtually nothing suggests a world tainted by
technology, yet no effort is made to disguise contemporary automobiles--tho
nothing else (but Caron's makeup) indicates the modern world. Horst Buchholz
plays the lovelorn Marius, torn between his passion for Fanny and the sea, with
his face a mask of perpetual torment. Riding the new wave of young German
actors (Maxmillian Schell, Oskar Werner) breaking thru the Teutonic ceiling,
Buchholz flashed briefly across American screens in a trio of films: The Magnificent
Seven, Fanny and Billy Wilder's One
Two Three. Just as quickly he rejected Hlwd for Europe ,
returning on rare occasions such as MGM's misbegotten remake of The Great Waltz in 1972. In Fanny he's a credible stud; a Germanic
Frenchman (hence the torment) whose smoulders with Caron are convincingly
heated. The fifth principal, Fanny's mother, Honorine, is played by the very
French volcano, Georgette Anys who plays everything from her bosom. You can
smell her perfume thru the screen. It's such a European cast, yet it's
interesting how American the film feels. Hlwd was making movies in Europe then
in every genre (even Westerns); and imports from the Continent were routinely
making a splash as well: Summertime, To
Catch a Thief, Never on Sunday, Come September, Topkapi, Charade, La Dolce
Vita, Bonjour Tristesse, Breathless, Black Orpheus (a French film in
Brazil), Light in the Piazza, It Started
in Naples. The visual record they have left of the mid-century world is
priceless. Nowadays it seems Hlwd uses the foreign climes only for props in
chases and thrillers, or as sets for fantasy worlds. Maybe the Marseille of the French Connection or Transporter films is the more accurate
picture, but how much lovelier the view in Fanny.
It's enuf to make you want to go there.
Beyond the seductive atmosphere, the story has a solid
emotional hold--it's a lovely tale with untypical main characters entwined by
strings of paternity. Marcel Pagnol took three leisurely films (which are
considered classics of early French cinema) to tell the story. MGM condensed
the trilogy into a single film (at a fast 81 minutes) in 1938, titled Port of Seven Seas . Written by Preston Sturges; and
directed by James Whale (after his Show
Boat) the film starred Wallace Beery, Frank Morgan and Mia Farrow's mother,
Maureen O'Sullivan. Despite this lineup the film was quickly dismissed, while
Pagnol's only grew in reputation. (His influence would extend as far as Berkeley , California
where chef Alice Waters would name her cafe, Chez Panisse to conjure the aura
& flavor of southern France .)
A musical version was inevitable, and tho it did well on Bway, it wasn't the
final word on the matter as far as Hlwd was concerned. "Joshua Logan's production of Fanny"--as it was billed, for they
couldn't quite call it Josh Logan's Fanny--was the Cinemascope edition, and
a happy success for Warner Bros. And that seems to be the final word on the
subject so far. Certainly the film didn't help boost interest in further
productions of the musical. By the '70s it was virtual extinct from the
repertory. Encores! got around to the show in 2010; and to no surprise received
polite, not enthusiastic, reviews. But if a film of the sung-musical might have
raised the show's fame, it would just as surely have diminished the success of
the movie.
The film opened at Radio City
on July 6, 1961. Among the current films around town were The Guns of Navarone, The Parent Trap, Two Women, Never on Sunday and
La Dolce Vita. Altogether a dozen
shows were running on Bway that soon would become films--tho not the newest
smash hit (again produced by David Merrick): Carnival, based on the MGM film Lili--and
yet another page in the Leslie Caron scrapbook--reversing the usual tragectory
in coming from Hlwd--it almost made
it back, but that's another story. As
the summer attraction of the Music Hall, Fanny
was a huge hit, holding for 9 weeks, nearly double the run of any other film in
the gigantic palace that year. It was among the top-grossing dozen films of
1961, earning $4,500,000 in rentals. It was critically well received as well,
among the NYTimes top ten films of the year; and 5 Oscar nominations, including
Best Picture, and a Best Actor nod for Charles Boyer. Alas, not for Leslie Caron--tho
she, and Chevalier (not Boyer) received Golden Globe nods, as did the picture.
Many nominations, but no awards.
I first saw the movie in October 1970, on the ABC Sunday
Night Movie in what was likely its network TV premiere. It was then common practice for
a film--especially one with any prestige or huge success--to take as
long as a decade or more before reaching television. Among the more exciting
pages of TV Guide's Fall Premiere Issue, was the listing of movies set to debut
on the three networks. Early fall would be front-loaded with the bigger hits of
years past, in showcase timeslots, attracting titanic ratings; tho of course
the price to pay was the inevitable insertion of commercials. But that's how we
watched TV then--there wasn't any other way--and where we caught so many of the
movies of our youth (the '50s & '60s) for the first time. Little did we
know how accessible--and commercial free--the whole universe would one day
become. My 17 year old self loved that first viewing of Fanny --and I have to say I'm sufficiently impressed by it some 40
years later. The story retains its potency and doesn't feel cliched. And how
refreshing to see characaters (no matter their conflicts) all love and care for
each other. Still there's plenty of drama here, and no villain. That, in
itself, is rather rare. Previously, I
hadn't noticed a corollary of the story with my own, in that I, too, once tore
myself away from an intense and passionate relationship in pursuit of a deeper
passion: pursuit of a career, in another town. Ultimately there was an equally
histrionic reunion with dramatic consequences; and even an (unborn) child in
the mix. But that, too, as they say, is another story.
Next Up: West Side Story
Next Up: West Side Story
Report Card:
Fanny
Overall Film: A-
Bway Fidelity: F for score/ B+ for story
Songs from Bway: 0
Songs Cut from Bway:
18
Casting: The Royal Hlwd French
Standout Cast:
Leslie Caron, Charles Boyer,
Georgette
Anys
Cast from Bway: None
Direction: Sweeping, cinematic
Choreography: None
Scenic Design: Romantic waterfront
Costumes: Rustic, summery
Standout Sets: Cesar's cafe looking out
across the wharf up to Notre Dame.
Titles: Flying into
the Port of Marseille
Oscar Noms: 5:
Picture, Actor (Boyer),
Cinematography, Scoring, Film Editing
No comments:
Post a Comment